A reader writes:
I’ve a senior position in a big structure and engineering firm, and my accomplice is an instructional. I generally ask him for recommendation on the best way to deal with a thorny drawback at work and sometimes ask him to learn one thing I’ve written. My accomplice, then again, often asks for my assist in core facets of his job — placing collectively a spreadsheet to prepare marking for programs, fixing up formatting on PowerPoint slides, shortening grant purposes to satisfy word-count necessities, drafting delicate emails, and so on. My accomplice additionally usually talks by concepts for papers, which I actually like doing.
For a few of these duties, I’m higher on the software program and might do them far more rapidly, whereas for others my accomplice is asking for my assist as a result of he’s slammed with work or has a decent deadline or wants one other pair of fingers and is aware of I’ll do job.
On the one hand, it seems like companions in a wedding ought to assist one another when wanted however then again, generally it seems like I’m doing the work for my accomplice, when I’ve my very own demanding job to do. So my query is, what’s the vary of “regular” inside relationships for a way a lot spouses assist one another with their jobs?
The way in which you’re doing it — asking for recommendation on the best way to deal with a thorny drawback or to learn over one thing you’ve written — is typical and nice. The way in which your accomplice is doing it — asking you to really carry out items of his job — isn’t.
A few of it’s the cumulative impact. It wouldn’t be a giant deal if he requested you as soon as for assist fixing the formatting on a PowerPoint. However when he’s often asking you to do what’s primarily admin help, that crosses a line. You’re not his administrative assistant, and if he wants that sort of assist, that’s an issue for his office to resolve, not a burden he ought to anticipate you to tackle. It’s undoubtedly not acceptable to show to you as a result of he’s busy and “wants one other pair of fingers.” That’s work. That’s one thing his employer is paying him for, not you, and perhaps they should pay somebody who isn’t him but it surely ought to go to an worker, not a supportive accomplice who’s keen to do it free of charge.
Furthermore, in lots of jobs, there could be monumental confidentiality issues with giving a non-employee entry to these sorts of supplies.
You aren’t an “further pair of fingers” to your accomplice’s employer. You is usually a sounding board and somebody he can brainstorm with. You shouldn’t be doing his precise work.